APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR ACADEMIC STAFFS
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL
APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR ACADEMIC STAFFS
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
In its most basic form, this appraisal technique requires students to assess an individual’s staff’s strengths, shortcomings, potentials, and so on. In most selection circumstances, especially those involving professional roles, performance evaluations from staff lecturers or colleagues are heavily weighted.
There are various flaws with the present manual system that will be addressed in this design. The performance appraisal system has taken on a new shape and nature in the form of a two-way communication channel between university employees and employers.
Proper communication between the assessing authority and the individual under appraisal is critical for getting all relevant information from the employee.
A performance rating system based on a free and unrestricted approach would produce the desired results and assist the university in becoming productive.
To achieve the desired objectives, the performance appraisal system should be realistic and impartial, with a focus on corrective actions. As a result, dexterity is required.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Some institutions conduct performance reviews primarily on personnel who are up for advancement. This approach has eroded the legitimacy of the appraisal system, which should have been organised on a regular basis for all staff to assess their performance and improve when necessary.
As a result, staff performance has been significantly impacted, affecting service productivity and efficiency. Again, there are many laxities on the part of university workers since they believe there is no monitoring of performance and it is applied, so they work at their own pace.
As a result, the design’s goal is to assess the effectiveness of the university’s existing performance rating system in terms of staff performance. Specifically, the academic personnel of the university, and develop a more structured framework.
Even if some respondents accepted the surveys, some of the spaces offered were left blank and will be absent when compared to the computerised technique.
1.3 Aim and Objectives
The appraisal system design’s aims are divided into two categories: general and specific.
1.3.1 The General Objective
The study’s overall goal was to assess the performance appraisal system and its impact on staff performance at Crawford University Service.
1.3.2. Specific Objectives
The following are the study’s particular objectives:
To establish a structured grading system using an electronic questionnaire.
To create a password-protected appraisal system and database.
Create a system to review and analyse data for decision assistance.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE
Because of its significant contribution to organisations today, performance appraisal systems have become critical tools. As a result, there is a need to create and analyse the university’s personnel performance system.
As a result, the research will assist the university senate, the academic dean, lecturers, and even students in recognising the importance of frequent performance reviews in schools.
Again, the research is designed to help school administrators understand the specific training and development needs of their personnel, as well as the importance of inspiring them.
Furthermore, the research is designed to assist university administrators in identifying the strengths and weaknesses inherent in the performance rating process, as well as how to enhance the system.
Finally, the design aims to serve as a scholarly achievement for future studies by students who may have the opportunity to conduct additional research on performance rating systems.
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The research aims to provide additional insight on Crawford University’s existing performance rating system. The assessment system design thus include the evaluation of academic personnel at the university.
1.6 Limitations of the Study
Lack of internet facilities
Getting the correct source code for system development.
Funding the project without compromise
1.7 Methodology
For the purposes of this project, C++ would be used as the system’s source code, while an implemented template would be used for the graphical user interface, HTML would be used for the user interface implementation, and SQL would be used for the database.
1.8 Definition of Terms
Performance appraisal is the process of reviewing an employee’s or a group of employees’ performance and progress on a specific job, as well as their potential for future development.
Database: A structured set of data stored on a computer for easy access and retrieval.
PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor is a server-side programming language design.
My SQL is an open-source relational database management system.
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic