COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR POWER, POLLUTION AND POLITICS
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR POWER, POLLUTION AND POLITICS
Nuclear Power: This article compares the environmental and health implications of nuclear and other electricity generation systems. The study examines the entire energy network, including routine operations as well as mishaps. A comparison of the environmental implications of waste management cycles linked with non-emission trash is also examined.
While nuclear power is economically practical and meets 17% of the world’s electricity demand, it emits almost no air polluting gases that harm the global climate.
Nuclear power, when compared to other electricity generation sources in terms of associated environmental releases of pollutants such as SOj, NOx, COj, CH, and radioisotopes, and taking into account the full fuel chain chains of supply option, will help to reduce environmental degradation due to electricity generation activities.
In terms of COj emissions, the ranking order begins with hydro, followed by nuclear, wind, and solar power plants. CO* emissions from a nuclear power station are two orders of magnitude lower than those from fossil-fueled units.
As a result, risk comparisons between different energy sources must take into account all phases of the energy cycle. Coal mining accidents have resulted in many thousand acute deaths over the years. Later fatalities were never estimated.
Then came hydropower, which caused numerous disasters and loss of human life. Following the oil and gas energy business, its tribute in acute fatalities is conveyed in over 1000 lives lost.
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic