Site icon Premium Researchers

Comparism Of Academic Performance Of Junior Secondary School Students In English Language Computer Science And Integrated Science In External Examinations

Comparism Of Academic Performance Of Junior Secondary School Students In English Language Computer Science And Integrated Science In External Examinations

Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic 

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL

 

Comparism Of Academic Performance Of Junior Secondary School Students In English Language Computer Science And Integrated Science In External Examinations

ABSTRACT

The study compared junior science students’ academic performance in external examinations between 2003 and 2007. This study used a survey research design. It is a survey conducted on a large number of people to determine general opinion. The study was conducted in Enugu North Local Government Area. The area falls under the Enugu Educational Zone.

The study’s population consists of all students and teachers from junior secondary schools in Enugu North Local Government Area, Enugu State. There are 20,470 students and 4,300 teachers. We sampled four junior secondary schools from Enugu North Local Government Area, Enugu State.

To ensure that the population’s relevant characteristics were appropriately represented, ten (10) students were randomly selected from each of the schools stated in the table above. Five (5) teachers from each school were also sampled. The instrument employed was a questionnaire designed to elicit responses to the items in questions.

The researchers utilised a four-point scale: strongly agreed (SA), agreed (A), disagreed (D), and severely disagreed (SD). Respondents are asked to mark the column that best expresses their opinions on each subject.

The questionnaire will be delivered to ten (10) students from each school, as well as five (5) teachers from each school, and will be gathered using items. The researchers utilised the mean to analyse and interpret the data. The data was interpreted using the following score intervals:

SA: Strongly Agreed – 4 points.

 

A: Agreed – 3 points.

D – Disagree – 2 points.

SD: Strongly Disagreed – 1 point.

The output was calculated by taking the average of each number.

 

Chapter one

Introduction:

Background of the Study.

Student academic performance is difficult to measure since it is influenced by socioeconomic, psychological, and environmental factors. Education should be growing as a profitable enterprise, with the primary goal of maximising profit by providing high-quality education that creates well-educated, skilled, and well-mannered students in response to the needs and expectations of a rapidly expanding market.

As a general rule, pupils are divided into two groups: those who progress and those who do not improve. Students’ performance is also affected by different factors such as learning abilities because the new paradigm about learning assumes that all students can and should learn at higher levels, but it should not be considered a constraint because other factors such as race, gender, and sex can affect students’ performance. Hansen (2000).

Mishae (2001) examined the impact of age, qualification, and distance from learning. Place on the students’ performance in his explanation relates the readiness to do a specific discipline in school; for example, a student who is not capable of doing sciences in secondary school joins sciences because his or her peers are offering the topics.

Winston et al. (2002) stated that students’ impatience is also correlated with their academic achievement. Yuonne (1998) went on to say that kids’ academic achievement is heavily influenced by their socioeconomic background; according to his assertion, secondary school students’ performance varies statistically significantly.

Alexander (2001) noted that some of the tactics used by secondary school administration can have an impact on students’ academic performance, such as organised study groups, debate clubs, media and culture clubs, and so on.

According to Bello Lawel, an Abuja-based educator and member of the All Nigeria Committee of Principals of Secondary Schools (ANCOPSS), Nigeria’s reading culture is typically bad.

To make matters worse, most of our students now read very little. Instead, they waste valuable time watching television or films, listening to music, playing music, and playing video/computer games.

Another educationist, Mohammed (2009), ascribed the poor performance in external tests to the government’s lax attitude and failure to effectively fund the education system.

According to him, we have repeatedly pleaded for more budget allocation to the education sector, but all of our efforts have been ignored. For example, UNESCO advises that the education sector receive 26% of a country’s budget, yet this is not the case in Nigeria.

The government pays lip respect to the education sector. Other countries that recognise the value of education have made proactive initiatives to fully fund their educational systems. For example, Ghana has allocated 29% of its budget to the education sector, well beyond the UNESCO benchmark.

Similarly, countries such as South Africa and Botswana allocated 35 and 37 percent of their budgets to education, respectively. So, unless these things are achieved, we will continue to jeopardise the future of our children.

Statement of the Problem

Secondary school pupils’ performance in external examinations has been a persistent concern in Nigeria, notably in Enugu North Local Government Area, Enugu State.
Language serves as an institutional medium. Effective teaching and learning require proper communication between the student and the teacher. In Nigeria, the English language is known as “Lingua Franka”.

Except in the vernacular, it is utilised to communicate with students in all Nigerian schools. The importance of English language cannot be overstated. That is why it appears practically every day on the school schedule.

 

Unfortunately, a casual evaluation of students’ performance in English language, particularly computer and integrated science, in external examinations in the Eungu North Local Government Area reveals nothing noteworthy.

Because computer and integrated science are relatively new in the development of science and technology, the researchers would like to investigate why there has always been low performance in English language, computer science, and integrated science on case studies from 2003 to 2007.

Second, what resources are accessible for teaching and learning the three topics of the Junior Secondary School Certificate Examination in Enugu Local Government Area?

The purpose of the study

Based on the study’s background and problem, the primary goal of this project is to compare junior secondary school students’ academic performance in English language, computer science, and integrated science in external examinations from 2003 to 2007.

(A case study of Enugu North Local Government Area, Enugu State) Specifically, the study seeks to determine:

1. Why do students score poorly in external examinations.

2. How students fare in external exams

3. How do students perform in external exams for English Language, Computer Science, and Integrated Science, and which of the listed performed better than others?

Significance of the Study

The value of research effort in the educational system cannot be overstated if the findings are appropriately used. It will help children, teachers, parents, and the government.

This would enable curriculum designers and classroom teachers use appropriate ways to improve meaningful learning and teaching for English language, Integrated Science, and computer science students. As a result, understanding students’ cognitive styles and attitudes would be extremely beneficial for both academic and professional development.

Scope of the Study

The study focused on junior secondary school students’ performance in external examinations in English Language, Integrated Science, and Computer Science in Enugu North Local Government Area, Enugu State. This especially applies to the following junior secondary schools:

1. New Layout Secondary School

2. Day Secondary School Independent Layout

3. Government Secondary School Enugu

4. Coal Camp Secondary School, Enugu.

The schools stated above are used in this study for greater coverage and ease of assessment.

 

Research Questions

The following research questions were developed to help guide the investigation. These questions are:-

1. What are the causes of pupils’ low performance on external exams?

2. How can students’ performance in external examinations be improved?

3. How do students perform in external examinations in English language, computer science, and integrated science, and which of the three areas do they score best in?

Limitations of the study

For proper project research to be carried out efficiently, there should be some limits along the way, which include:
Time Constraint: This is the amount of time required for students to complete a specific project study topic.

First and foremost, in order for a student to realise his or her project research goals, effective plans for obtaining the necessary materials should be developed.

And this will be realised by adequate study, which may include travelling from one location to another in quest of these items. By doing so, time is consumed.

On the other hand, some students in a certain group may make excuses that the time set is inconvenient for them, while others may complain that they generally do domestic labour for their parents during the project research exercise, which may require their whole attention.

In order to balance the equation, adequate time management plans are required.

Money: This refers to the amount of money required for the project to be completed. If the amount required increases, certain students in a group may be affected, reducing their possibilities of participation and eventually terminating their work because nothing good comes easily without money.

Difficulty Experiences: This is the experience we have with our group. Because each person has his or her own unique personality and routine for everyday activities, nothing can be done simultaneously. As a result, the time frame for a certain group to complete their project research differs.

Insincerity in responding to questionnaire items: this is the supervisor’s failure to effectively explain the most important aspects of the project and how he wants it completed. The project writer may have difficulty coping.

Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic 

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL

Exit mobile version