EFFECT OF DUMPING IN DIXIE: RACE, CLASS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL
EFFECT OF DUMPING IN DIXIE: RACE, CLASS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
INTRODUCTION
Being poor, working-class, or a person of colour in the United States frequently entails carrying a disproportionate amount of the nation’s environmental challenges.
Beginning with the assumption that all Americans have a fundamental right to live in a healthy environment, Dumping in Dixie follows the efforts of five African American communities, propelled by the civil rights movement, to connect ecology with issues of social justice.
In the third edition, Bullard reports from the front lines of the environmental justice movement on new developments in environmental racism, various organising techniques, and success stories in the fight for environmental fairness.
Dumping in Dixie, Robert Bullard addresses the subject of environmental racism. His thorough study is carefully organised into parts that continue to astound the reader, with each section containing evidence that demonstrate that minorities do, in fact, live in less environmentally safe locations.
These are the areas where multinational firms prefer to locate their power plants and toxic waste dumps. Bullard demonstrates that firms and the government deliberately choose these places in order to circumvent and evade pollution regulations.
Bullard, an environmental sociologist, nailed the mark with this classic work. The book is a statement or a demand that the rights of people of colour and underprivileged communities be preserved. It emphasises the expanding health, economic, and environmental disparities that exist as we go into the twenty-first century.
He mentions a few small, low-income towns as instances of where hazardous trash is located. Through these small communities, he investigates the country’s corporate influence over laws, namely pollution laws.
Bullard’s main point is that the environmental movement did not begin or grow in low-income communities, allowing for “environmental injustice” and allowing for the exploitation of those who are less fortunate; those who are unable to speak up for themselves and, more importantly, those who lack knowledge of the issue.
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic