IMPACT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ON EMPLOYEES MOTIVATION
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL
IMPACT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ON EMPLOYEES MOTIVATION
Chapter one
1.1 Introduction.
Performance appraisal is a procedure that investigates and evaluates job performance. Appraisal is a useful tool in human resource management; if applied appropriately and logically, organisations can achieve their goals (Rezghi Ros tami, 2000).
Employee motivation is fundamental to the operations of organisations. Every organization’s success is dependent on the personnel motivation provided by its directors (Abedinirad & Hazer, 1995).
Identifying skilled employees and providing them with prizes (bonuses) as a kind of motivation to improve their performance is one of the most important aspects of performance appraisal (loker, 1977).
KavussiShal (1999) feels that the assessment system is an effective tool for improving the quality and quantity of labour performance. Nowadays, performance appraisal is seen as an important feature of human resource management and a component of the administrative control process (KavussiShal, 1999).
Planning the appraisal process is an important subject in the government’s official system, which is conducted annually in governmental organisations, requiring a significant amount of time and money to achieve objectives such as manpower development, including improvements, promotions and assignments in managerial positions, persuasion and punishment, salary increases, personnel performance feedback, and determining their educational requirements.
To achieve an organization’s goals, each individual must be aware of his or her position. With this awareness, employees can identify the strengths and weaknesses in their performance and behaviour, allowing them to resolve problems and deficiencies and increase efficiency and effectiveness.
As a result, assessment can be viewed as an essential aspect in evaluating people’s abilities and capacities, with the outcomes informing them of advancements, plans, and goals.
An organisation must assess staff efficiency in order to improve manpower status, increase production and service volume, and make positive changes in its trend.
Despite ongoing efforts to develop a more effective performance appraisal system, there is compelling evidence of the authority’s dissatisfaction with the appraisal procedures (Fox, 1987).
Appraisal systems are typically plagued by the following issues: a lack of proper support from management, impracticality, the appraiser’s failure to conduct a correct and fair appraisal, and a lack of conformity with reality (Lures, 1980).
Performance assessments are essential for effective employee monitoring and costing. Appraisals assist to grow individuals, improve secretarial routines, and foster business progress. Ceremonial performance evaluations are often held once a year for all employees in the organisation, and everyone is evaluated by their line supervisor.
Performance appraisals are also important for career and succession planning. Performance reviews are aimed to inspire employees, enhance their position and behaviour, communicate directorial goals, and foster positive relationships between management and employees.
Performance assessments provide a recognised, documented, and customary review of an individual’s routine, as well as a plan for future expansion. In short, performance and career judgement are critical for managing the performance of natives and organisations.
(Panagar 2009.) Performance evaluation should be viewed as an ongoing developmental process rather than a one-time review. It should be closely monitored by both workers and assessors to ensure that targets are met.
You will create an encouraging mindset by physically preparing and demonstrating a desire to collaborate with your reviewer to expand your duty. Worker act, in common, submit to behaviour with the objective of applying to directorial goals and with the intention of organising entity workforce (J.P et al. 1993).
In the past, performance evaluations were sometimes ambiguous and poorly administered. While raising, the majority of individual directors will commit canopy with the purpose of using their mass critical means for the section’s analysis component.
The issue is that, on the whole, managers, supervisors, and employees despise the inference for them and rarely achieve completeness. Individual reserve specialists waste a lot of time persuading lay individuals to perform things, whereas managers look for a variety of motivation to wildcat strike the sequence.
The objective behind this is that it is consistently an aggressive follow-up to clutch out, group get on performance assessment for the wrong reasons, and from the wrong perspective. This can end up putting the administrative and employee on different “sides”.
Assessments are used to determine who is influential in disbursing funds, who is let go, and who becomes a sponsor. Almost everyone is tired of focusing on who is invalid. (Jr 2009).
Provides managers with decision-making information on human resources, expand and progress report with employees, and establish stronger working relationships. Identifies performers in need of coaching/guidance and encourages them to take responsibility for their performance and improvement.
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic