COMPUTERIZED CASE SCHEDULING SYSTEM OF COURT OF LAW
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT MATERIAL
COMPUTERIZED CASE SCHEDULING SYSTEM OF COURT OF LAW
Chapter one
INTRODUCTION
The judiciary is the third branch of government, after the legislative and the executive. The key tasks of this arm include establishing cases, finding qualified individuals, interpreting the land’s constitution, and administering justice.
Other tasks include interpreting laws passed by the legislative branch of government and declaring legislative acts null and void, unconstitutional, and of no consequence.
Furthermore, the judiciary is the last hope of the common man. They accomplish this by protecting the rights and liberties of citizens. The person who is aggrieved might seek remedies in court.
The court is responsible for ensuring that justice prevails. During elections, judges may establish who won and who rigged the election as part of a settlement between individuals and the state.
The judiciary operates through courts that resolve factual disputes and adjudicate between contending parties. The Nigerian legal system is organised in a hierarchy of courts, beginning with the customary court (Alkaki Court or Sharia Court), followed by the Magistrate Court and High Court, and finally with the Supreme Court.
In a democratic system, the Ministry of Justice is headed by a minister with a portfolio. The minister also serves as the attorney general of the country.
Section 6(1) of the Nigerian Constitution of 1991 establishes the following courts in the federal republic of Nigeria.
The Supreme Court
The Court of Appeal
The Sharia Court
The Customary Court
The constitutional courts are Nigeria’s only superior courts of record. The Supreme Court is the highest court, and all its decisions are binding on all other courts. In Nigeria, the state court structure includes a court of appeals, which hears appeals from decisions of higher courts.
The Sharia Court of Appeal and the Customer Court of Appeal. Appeals from the decision of the court of appeals go to the Supreme Court.
In terms of administration, state courts are the most important court in each state. This argument is bolstered by the constitution’s direct establishment of a high court in each state, with each state having the option of establishing a Sharia Court of Appeal or a customary court of appeal.
However, for the court to conduct its judicial functions effectively, a computer-based system must be implemented into the court system.
The database system will ensure improved control, regular and effective documentation of case files, and case scheduling. This article, thus, provides an analysis of the design and implementation of a computerised court system in case scheduling, using Imo State High Court Owerri as a case study.
Brief History of the Imo State High Court
Prior to the establishment of British colonial authority in Igbo country, the Igbos had a well-established traditional system of adjudication.
The colonial administration considered the arrangement convenient, as did native courts, which served as forerunners to today’s courts. The native court persisted even after various agitations for its eventual removal.
However, in accordance with the provisions of the federal republic of Nigeria’s constitution for the establishment of the state high court, the Imo state high court Owerri was established following the creation of the state, and is located along Orlu Road in the Owerri metropolis.
Imo state has courts ranging from 1 to 9, each with its own chief judge. The Imo State High Court in Owerri has limitless jurisdiction over the state in all disputes involving federal government-owned parastatals such as institutions, organisations, and schools. There are various judicial rulings made for administrative purposes.
Organisation Structure
Imo State High Court’s organisational structure depicts the hierarchy of staff, distinct function departments, individual roles, and their relationships for orderly and logical layout.
Personnel Duties
Personnel functions are interconnected, and some are so complex that work may be jeopardised if roles are not properly understood and carried out.
As a result, the majority of staff responsibilities must be explained.
The chief judge is the executive officer of the State High Court. He has limitless jurisdiction, oversees the entire body, and adjudicates matters.
The administrative judge: The administrative judge of each division assigns matters to the appropriate courts for hearing. He also spoke with the court clerk regarding cases that had been placed into the court’s dairy.
The chief registrar, often known as the sheriff, oversaw all executions and sales under his direction. He is also the head of administration. He complies and transfers matters, including petitions against parties.
The director of personnel is also the head of administration. He accumulates and transfers issues, petitions against personnel, and coordinates the process of staff promotion under the close supervision of the registrar.
Assistant Chief Registrar: They provide effective services for filling out and processing court proceedings with the goal of reporting to the judge for jurisdiction. They also administer oaths.
The chief accountant is in charge of financial affairs such as federal appropriations, liaises with the senior accountant and the accountant, and ensures that employees receive their salaries.
The senior clerical officer oversees information control in the clerk’s office. He attends to public documents case files, enters cases into the court’s dairy, and schedules hearings.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
In response to knowledge or a requirement to computerise a court’s case scheduling system or technique. In order to address the inefficiencies associated with the manual system or method of case scheduling and analysing court proceedings, which include the following erroneous recording: there is a high likelihood of error when records are kept manually.
There is a strong tendency to waste time. Manually processing and analysing data or information is much more arduous and time-consuming than a computerised method.
Inadequate Planning and Design
The sole purpose and goal of this project is to create and implement a computer-based system for case scheduling in a court of law. It also tries to ensure the flow of information, communication, and documentation among all parties involved.
Ensures a faster and more effective computerised system.
Source information for students or researchers interested in pursuing a relevant topic of study.
Ensure an effective storage and retrieval system in a court of law employing a computer system.
Improve the security of information, documents, and files.
Design a system that will respond immediately to any request for re-confirmation of case scheduling in a court.
To provide capabilities that allow for easy system updates and maintenance.
Need help with a related project topic or New topic? Send Us Your Topic